Direct and indirect costs, billing practices, and payments to human service zones, human service zones agreements and plans, creation of human service zones, human service zone directors, and the indirect cost plan.
Impact
The amendments facilitated by HB 1046 will enable a structured approach to managing human service funds, potentially improving the efficiency of service delivery across different counties. By outlining clear standards for cost categorization, the bill allows counties to better plan and utilize their budgets, ensuring that resources are directed appropriately towards direct service costs while maintaining accountability for indirect costs. Additionally, this might influence the overall quality of services provided within human service zones, as counties become better equipped to manage their fiscal responsibilities and service obligations.
Summary
House Bill 1046 aims to amend various sections of the North Dakota Century Code related to human service zones, particularly focusing on direct and indirect costs, billing practices, and payments to these zones. The bill establishes clear definitions and guidelines for costs associated with human services, which are provided to individuals and families in need, including child welfare, medical assistance, and economic support. This legislative measure seeks to ensure that the funding and resource allocation among counties are handled effectively, supporting their operational capabilities in delivering essential human services.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1046 appears largely positive among advocates of improved human services management. Supporters assert that the bill will lead to better administration of human services, with a focus on accountability and transparency in financial dealings. However, there may be some contention, particularly from critics concerned about the potential complexity it introduces in cost allocation, fearing that it may inadvertently create barriers for smaller counties or those with limited administrative capacity to comply with the new requirements.
Contention
Notable points of contention around HB 1046 focus on the implications of establishing stringent guidelines for cost allocation and the potential for inequities among counties with varying levels of administrative resources. There is a concern that while the bill aims to streamline operations and accountability, smaller counties may struggle to meet the compliance standards set forth, thereby affecting their ability to provide necessary services or to participate fully in the human services system. This aspect of the bill may require ongoing dialogue among policymakers to address the concerns of under-resourced areas.
No Subsidies for Wealthy Universities ActThis bill limits the indirect costs that are allowable under federal research awards to institutions of higher education (IHEs) with endowments above specified thresholds. (Generally, indirect costs represent expenses that are not specific to a research project but are needed to maintain the infrastructure and administrative support for federally funded research.)Specifically, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) must annually collect information regarding the endowments of each IHE that has entered into a program participation agreement with the Department of Education.With this collected information, NCES must identify and make lists of (1) each IHE with an endowment of more than $5 billion, and (2) each IHE with an endowment of more than $2 billion (but not more than $5 billion). NCES must submit these lists to the Office of Management and Budget, which must then distribute the lists to federal agencies, Congress, and the public.The bill establishes the following limits on the indirect costs allowable under federal research awards:for an IHE with an endowment of more than $5 billion, the IHE is prohibited from using these awards for indirect costs;for an IHE with an endowment of more than $2 billion (but not more than $5 billion), the IHE is limited to an indirect cost rate of 8%; andfor all other IHEs, an indirect cost rate of 15%.The Government Accountability Office must annually report to Congress on indirect cost reimbursement on federal research awards for IHEs.