North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1143

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Report Pass
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Engrossed
2/21/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Refer
3/17/25  

Caption

A BILL for an Act to provide an appropriation to the agriculture commissioner for a food distribution facility grant program.

Impact

The bill represents a significant investment in addressing hunger and food access issues in North Dakota. By providing a centralized facility for food distribution, it is expected to improve the efficiency of distributing charitable food resources across communities. The stipulation that grant recipients must match the funds with private contributions indicates a collaborative approach to funding and sustainability. This type of grant-funding initiative is intended to streamline resources and improve service delivery to vulnerable populations in need of food assistance.

Summary

House Bill 1143 aims to appropriate $10 million to the agriculture commissioner for the establishment of a food distribution facility grant program in North Dakota. The bill focuses on enhancing food distribution infrastructure within the state, particularly targeting charitable organizations that address food insecurity. Through this funding, grant recipients can acquire sites, pay for architecture, engineering, and construction of food distribution facilities, thereby bolstering the logistics of charitable food programs statewide.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1143 appears largely positive, with support from various stakeholders who prioritize food security and agricultural investment. Legislators who advocate for this bill often see it as a necessary step towards reinforcing the infrastructure that supports nonprofit organizations working on the ground. However, there may be discussions focused on the allocation of resources, ensuring that funds are effectively utilized and accountability is maintained among grant recipients.

Contention

One notable point of contention might stem from the limited scope of funding and its potential reach. While the bill allocates substantial resources, stakeholders could debate the criteria for eligibility and effectiveness of the funded facilities. Furthermore, there may be discussions on how to ensure equitable access to the funding and the infrastructure that it supports, preventing a concentration of resources in more affluent areas. Addressing these concerns will be important for maximizing the benefits of the program.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.