North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1214

Introduced
1/10/25  
Refer
1/10/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
2/20/25  
Engrossed
2/25/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Enrolled
5/1/25  

Caption

Payments for school district transportation of students, special education students, and career and technical education students, the distribution of transportation payments in the event of school district closure, and state transportation payments to school districts; and to provide an effective date.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1214 is expected to have significant implications for how transportation aid is allocated following the closure of a school district. The bill prescribes a method for adjusting transportation averages for students who attended a closed district, thus aiming to provide necessary support to those students in transitioning to their new schools. Furthermore, it defines eligibility criteria for school districts to receive funding for transporting special education students and emphasizes compliance with state laws governing school bus standards, promoting accountability across districts.

Summary

House Bill 1214 aims to modify transportation funding for school districts in North Dakota by redefining how transportation average daily membership equivalents are calculated. This bill introduces a new section to the North Dakota Century Code that specifies how various factors, such as eligible bus miles and runs, will be used to determine weighted student unit equivalents for transportation funding. The goal of this legislation is to ensure a more equitable distribution of transportation funds among school districts regardless of the existing disparities in district sizes and student populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1214 appears predominantly supportive among legislative members, as reflected in the unanimous Senate vote (47-0). Advocates for the bill argue that it will level the playing field for smaller districts that may struggle with transportation funding under the previous system. However, there are underlying concerns that the shifts in funding formulas could unintentionally disadvantage certain districts if not implemented carefully, signifying a need for ongoing evaluation of the bill's effectiveness.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges of ensuring that all eligible districts fully understand and comply with the new measures set out in the bill. The fine details of the transportation funding calculations may raise questions about transparency and accessibility for smaller districts that possess fewer resources compared to larger entities. Furthermore, discussions may arise around the necessity of reviewing how these funding changes affect the availability of transportation aids for students, particularly those in special education programs who require reliable and consistent transportation services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1530

K-12 education; 2023-2024.

AZ HB2577

K-12 education; 2023-2024

AZ HB2124

School districts; tuition; expenditures

MS HB1686

MAEP; determine cost of using Average Daily Membership (ADM) in lieu of ADA with 90% threshold attendance trigger.

MS HB1181

MAEP; determine cost of using average daily membership (ADM) in lieu of average daily attendance (ADA).

MS HB1176

MAEP; determine cost of using Average Daily Membership (ADM) in lieu of ADA with 90% threshold attendance trigger.

MS HB1369

MAEP; determine cost of using Average Daily Membership (ADM) in lieu of ADA with 90% threshold attendance trigger.

AZ HB2850

2022-2023 budget; K-12 education