North Dakota House Bill HB1274

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 2/21/25
• Engrossed: 2/25/25
• Refer: 3/7/25
• Report Pass: 3/24/25
• Enrolled: 4/9/25
• Passed: 4/18/25

Caption

Membership of the public employees retirement system public safety retirement plan.

Impact

The primary impact of HB 1274 is the shift in the retirement planning structure for future employees of the state. By closing the defined benefit plan to new hires, the state aims to stabilize its financial obligations regarding retirement benefits. This change is expected to affect not only the financial management of retirement funds but also the attractiveness of public sector employment, as prospective employees may perceive the modified retirement benefits as less favorable compared to previous offerings.

Summary

House Bill 1274 amends existing statutes pertaining to the membership and contributions for the public employees retirement system in North Dakota, specifically related to the public safety retirement plan. The bill introduces changes to definitions regarding eligible employees, specifically excluding new hires from the defined benefit plan and requiring them to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan starting from January 1, 2025. Those already in the system prior to this date will retain their current benefits under the defined benefit plan.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 1274 has been mixed. Proponents argue that the transition to a defined contribution system addresses fiscal sustainability and aligns more closely with the trends observed in private sector employment benefits. Conversely, critics raise concerns about the potential reduction in retirement security for future public employees, arguing that defined contribution plans place more financial risk on the employees themselves rather than the employer, which could discourage candidates from pursuing careers in public service.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the perceived adequacy of the defined contribution system. Stakeholders emphasize the inherent risks associated with individuals managing their own retirement savings, especially in terms of market fluctuations that could affect their retirement outcomes. Additionally, discussions highlight the implications for long-serving public employees who may feel their prior years of service are devalued by shifting retirement plans mid-career.