North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1446

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/15/25  

Caption

Party organization endorsements, certificates of endorsement, and the minimum vote required at a primary election for nomination.

Impact

The bill could significantly impact how political parties and organizations nominate candidates in North Dakota. By setting clear parameters for endorsements and requiring documentation for candidates, such as certificates of endorsement and nominating petitions, it seeks to create a more structured process. This clarity could potentially benefit parties by streamlining candidate selection and ensuring compliance with state regulations. However, by instituting specific requirements, it may also present challenges for smaller or newly formed political organizations that might struggle to meet the threshold for endorsements.

Summary

House Bill 1446 amends several sections of the North Dakota Century Code related to the nomination of candidates by political parties, specifically concerning the endorsement process and the requirements for candidates to appear on the primary election ballot. The bill attempts to clarify the procedures surrounding candidate endorsements and establishes criteria for organizations wanting to nominate candidates for various offices. It aims to ensure that party endorsements are regulated systematically, providing a framework for both established and new parties in the state.

Sentiment

Initial sentiment surrounding HB 1446 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to maintain the integrity and organization of the electoral process by ensuring that only credible candidates, backed by legitimate endorsements, make it onto the ballot. Opponents, however, express concern that the bill could disadvantage smaller parties or independent candidates who may not have the same resources as larger party organizations to navigate these endorsement challenges effectively.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential implications for political diversity within the state’s electoral process. Critics argue that the barriers introduced by stringent endorsement requirements may further entrench the dominance of established parties, thereby squeezing out less-known candidates and reducing voters' choices. This concern is paramount in discussions about democracy and representation, as critics believe that HB 1446 may inadvertently limit political opportunities for new or independent voices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

ND HB1424

A candidate's contact information and the form of a nominating petition and a certificate of endorsement.

ND SB2280

The form of the primary election ballot.

ND HB1192

Electronic voting systems, electronic voting devices, absentee voting, meeting of presidential electors, and canvassing boards.

ND SB2292

Election offenses and election observers; and to provide a penalty.

ND SB2316

Decertification of election equipment, manual ballot recounts, and county election officials' responsibilities.

ND HB1317

Ballots and voting system supplies.

ND HB1500

Identifying the ultimate and true source of funds; and to provide a penalty.

ND SB2386

Pollbooks, voter lists, reports generated from the central voter file, and reports submitted to the county auditor.

ND SB2318

Reporting of aggregate expenditures for political purposes; and to provide a penalty.

ND HB1204

Placing an applicant's name on the ballot and the order of offices on the ballot.

Similar Bills

MN SF1362

Omnibus Elections policy bill

NM SB218

Election Changes

MN SF1624

Election provision of Metropolitan Council members

MN HF2092

Metropolitan governance task force created.

MN HF1723

Elections finance and policy bill.

MN SF3096

Omnibus Elections policy and appropriations

VA HB440

Candidates for office; electronic filing of forms, petitions, and notifications.

VA HB440

Candidates for office; electronic filing of forms, petitions, and notifications.