NH
New Hampshire House Bill HCR8

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HCR8

Introduced
11/20/21  
Refer
11/20/21  

Caption

Affirming states' rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Impact

The impact of HCR8 on state laws primarily revolves around reinforcing state sovereignty and calling local legislatures to recognize their powers against perceived federal overreach. It mirrors concerns that the general government might assume undelegated powers, which would render its acts null and void. By framing the resolution within the context of states' rights, it directly affects the relationship between states and the federal government by asserting that any federal action not explicitly authorized by the Constitution should be viewed as illegitimate, encouraging states to resist such actions.

Summary

HCR8 is a resolution affirming the rights of states based on Jeffersonian principles, emphasizing the sovereignty and self-governing powers of individual states. The resolution articulates the belief that states possess the exclusive right to govern themselves, retaining powers that have not been expressly delegated to the federal government. Additionally, it reflects the historical context of the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the United States to the states or the people. By reaffirming this principle, the resolution seeks to underline the importance of limited government and the protection of state autonomy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR8 appears to be largely supportive among proponents of states' rights, who view it as a necessary reaffirmation of constitutional principles designed to limit federal power. Advocates argue that endorsing these principles is essential to maintaining balance between state and federal authority. However, there may also be dissenting perspectives, particularly from those who view such affirmations as potentially obstructive to federal initiatives that could benefit states. Overall, the discourse reflects a classic tension in American political philosophy regarding the delineation of powers between state and national authorities.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HCR8 include the interpretation of federalism and states' rights in the context of modern governance. Critics may argue that extreme interpretations of states' rights can lead to fragmentation of federal policies that are designed to unify standards across states, thus jeopardizing collective national interests. Proponents respond by asserting the necessity of maintaining a watchful stance against federal encroachment on state jurisdiction, invoking historical precedent. The resolution highlights an ongoing debate regarding the appropriate scope of federal versus state authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH HCR3

Relative to affirming states' power over the federal constitution.

NH HCR76

Memorializing Congress in defense of the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, affirming the right of states to nullify acts of Congress, executive orders, and judicial orders, and calling for the creation of a joint committee to communicate with other states about the limits of federal power.

NH HCR72

Affirming the sovereign right of the State of West Virginia to nullify un-Constitutional acts

NH HCR66

Affirming the sovereign right of the State of West Virginia to nullify un-Constitutional acts

NH HCR6008

Affirming, supporting, and defending certain principles, values, and goals.

NH HCR66

Memorializing Congress in defense of the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, affirming the right of states to nullify acts of Congress, executive orders, and judicial orders, and asserting that any act, executive order, or judicial order that assumes a power not delegated to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution and which diminishes the liberty of any state or citizen shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution.

NH HJR1

Affirming the natural right of persons and affirming that the state and federal government are established for the purpose of upholding, protecting, and securing these rights.

NH HB1356

"Mississippi Founding Principle Act"; enact to require social studies curriculum to provide instruction on founding documents and principles.

NH HR13

Affirming support for the people of Puerto Rico.

NH HR5

A resolution regarding foundational principles of the American form of government.

Similar Bills

CA AJR27

Convention of states for proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution: federal balanced budget.

AL SJR57

RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

AL HJR104

RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

NJ AJR207

Urges Congress to call constitutional convention to consider reproductive health care rights.

WV HCR75

To repeal the 16th amendment to the U.S. Constitution

HI SR81

Ratifying A Proposed Amendment To The Constitution Of The United States Giving The Congress Of The United States Power To Limit, Regulate, And Prohibit The Labor Of Persons Under Eighteen Years Of Age.

HI SR109

Ratifying A Proposed Amendment To The Constitution Of The United States Giving The Congress Of The United States Power To Limit, Regulate, And Prohibit The Labor Of Persons Under Eighteen Years Of Age.

TX HJR44

Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing an amendment to the constitution to provide for a federal balanced budget.