Relative to the adequate education grants for fiscal year 2023.
Impact
If enacted, SB426 aims to stabilize funding for public schools by mitigating the negative consequences of declining enrollment due to the pandemic. The bill proposes to ensure that schools are funded based on their highest enrollment figures during a time when many districts are struggling with reduced numbers of students. This financial support is particularly crucial as it directly influences the ability of local districts to provide adequate educational resources and services.
Summary
Senate Bill 426 (SB426), introduced in the 2022 legislative session, is designed to amend the method for calculating adequate education grants for the fiscal year 2023. The legislation mandates that the Commissioner of Education uses the highest enrollment figures from three specific school years (2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2021-2022) when determining the average daily membership in residence (ADMR). This adjustment seeks to address the fluctuations in student enrollment exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent impacts on public school funding.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB426 appears mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for maintaining a consistent level of funding amidst fluctuating enrollment patterns, which have been influenced by the pandemic. However, there are concerns from some legislators and educators who feel that this approach may not adequately reflect the current needs of schools, particularly those that have experienced significant enrollment drops and changes in student demographics during the past few years.
Contention
Key points of contention regarding SB426 revolve around the implications for future funding calculations and equitable distribution of resources. Critics express that while the bill provides temporary relief, it may not address the root causes of declining enrollment or the long-term financial stability of education funding across the state. Additionally, there are concerns that using past enrollment figures could set a precedent that doesn’t account for shifting population dynamics and varying local needs in the education landscape.
Relative to the cost of an opportunity for an adequate education, extraordinary need grants, fiscal capacity disparity aid, and determination of education grants.
Increasing the maximum benefits for first responders critically injured in the line of duty, relative to the determination of education adequacy grants and calculation of certain group II benefits within the retirement system.
Relative to student eligibility for education freedom accounts and the scholarship organization's costs of administering the program, extending phase-out grants for education freedom accounts, and revising the definitions of average daily membership in attendance and average daily membership in residence.