New Hampshire Senate Bill SB429

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/30/21
• Refer: 12/30/21
• Report Pass: 2/10/22
• Engrossed: 3/23/22
• Refer: 3/23/22
• Report Pass: 4/22/22
• Enrolled: 5/27/22
• Chaptered: 6/8/22
• Passed: 6/8/22

Caption

Relative to the site evaluation committee.

Impact

The implications of SB429 are significant for both the regulatory framework governing energy facilities and for public interaction. By instituting mandatory public notice at least seven days prior to all hearings, the bill aims to improve transparency and public engagement in the evaluation process of energy projects. The revision of the composition of the SEC and its training mandates intends to foster a more effective and knowledgeable committee that can adequately address the complexities of energy facility applications, potentially improving the efficiency of the evaluation process.

Summary

SB429 addresses the operations and governance of the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee (SEC), which oversees the evaluation of energy facilities. The bill modifies the structure of the SEC by allowing agency designees to participate and reducing the quorum needed for meetings from seven to five members. It also expands the training requirements for committee members to ensure they are adequately prepared to evaluate applications concerning energy infrastructure. Additionally, the bill establishes more rigorous public notice requirements for committee meetings and proceedings, enhancing community involvement in these discussions.

Contention

While the bill advances several beneficial reforms, there are points of contention primarily revolving around the increased fees associated with filing applications for energy facilities. The proposed fee schedule raises several application fees, which some stakeholders view as a barrier to entry for smaller energy projects and potentially problematic in terms of economic equity. Furthermore, the authority granted to the SEC to impose fines for violations of certificates adds another layer of enforcement capability, which could lead to concerns about over-regulation and increased costs for businesses in the energy sector.