Relating to taxation. Providing that a 2/3 vote is required to pass legislation imposing new or increased taxes or license fees, or to authorize the issuance of state bonds and providing that the general court shall appropriate funds for payment of interest and installments of principle of all state bonds.
The general sentiment around CACR15 emphasizes a significant shift in the state's legislative process regarding taxation. If enacted, it will alter the current voting requirements, which only necessitate a simple majority. Proponents of the amendment argue that higher thresholds for tax increases are essential for protecting taxpayers from sudden or excessive financial burdens. Critics, however, express concerned that such a requirement could hinder the state's ability to effectively respond to economic challenges or adequately fund public services, potentially undermining state fiscal management.
CACR15 proposes a constitutional amendment that would require a two-thirds majority vote in both the New Hampshire House of Representatives and the Senate to pass any new or increased taxes, license fees, or state bonds. This requirement aims to make it more difficult for the legislature to impose new financial obligations on residents and businesses, reflecting a desire to prioritize fiscal restraint and transparency in governmental financial decisions. The amendment also mandates that the general court must appropriate funds for the repayment of the state's bonded debts as they come due, if approved.
The discussion around CACR15 has been polarized, with supporters viewing it as a protective measure for taxpayers and a necessary constraint on government spending. On the contrary, opponents warn that the requirement for a supermajority could cripple essential public funding and limit necessary governance. This divergence illustrates an underlying tension in fiscal policy debates, where the balance between state revenue generation and taxpayer protection remains a contentious issue.
Notably, the bill's requirement for a supermajority could significantly impact future legislative sessions by complicating the passage of any new tax legislation. This would particularly concern fiscal policies related to social services and infrastructure projects, which often rely on government funding. By instituting a higher voting threshold, CACR15 could lead to prolonged legislative battles over tax-related issues, thereby impacting the timely delivery of essential services within the state.