Applying to congress for a limited national convention for the exclusive purpose of proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution relative to elections.
The bill aims to restore balance and integrity in U.S. elections by addressing issues highlighted in the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and similar rulings. If enacted, it would initiate a process where states could collectively call for a convention with the goal of enacting constitutional protections for free and fair elections. This resolution underscores the necessity for a collaborative approach among states, aiming for two-thirds agreement to convene such a convention, thus impacting not only New Hampshire law but potentially influencing electoral processes nationwide.
HCR8 is a House Concurrent Resolution from New Hampshire applying to Congress for a limited national convention to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution specifically addressing elections. This bill reflects a response to perceived imbalances in the representative democracy of the United States, which, according to its proponents, have been exacerbated by the influence of powerful special interests and third-party groups in electoral processes. The resolution emphasizes the intent to reform government for the common benefit, asserting that elections should be accessible to all citizens free from undue influence.
The sentiment surrounding HCR8 appears to be supportive among those advocating for electoral reform, as it seeks to diminish the disproportionate power of special interests in elections. Advocates see this as a necessary measure to return political power to the people. However, potential opponents may express concerns regarding the implications of such a convention, fearing it could lead to unintended consequences or broader amendments that may shift power dynamics within the government.
A notable point of contention within the discussion of HCR8 might revolve around the selection of delegates for the national convention. The resolution stipulates that delegates should be current state and local officials or elected individuals within congressional districts, effectively excluding any individuals who have held federal office. This raises questions about the inclusiveness of the process and whether it adequately represents diverse political perspectives. Additionally, the broader implications of amending the U.S. Constitution, particularly relating to elections, are contentious topics, with varying opinions on the necessity and potential risks involved.