The legislative changes outlined in SB 492 will have a direct impact on municipal budgeting, as local governments are projected to incur increased expenditures due to the higher fees required for operator certification. According to the fiscal note accompanying the bill, municipalities could face additional costs of up to $12,000 per year, while counties might see increases of up to $500. These financial implications are significant as municipalities balance their budgets and pursue state and local grant opportunities for wastewater projects. The increased state contribution of 20% on eligible costs is also expected to provide some financial relief to municipalities engaged in constructing sewage disposal facilities.
Summary
Senate Bill 492 aims to amend existing laws related to wastewater engineering in the state of New Hampshire. Notably, it removes the term 'intercepting' from statutes governing state aid for sewer construction projects, indicating a move toward modernizing the language used in such legislation. This change comes alongside a proposal to raise fees for wastewater operator certification, which will now amount to $100 for renewals and new certifications, an increase from the previous $50. The bill is primarily aimed at enhancing the clarity and efficiency of regulations governing wastewater management.
Contention
Discussions regarding SB 492 may reveal points of contention surrounding the increases in certification fees and operational costs for local governments. Some proponents argue that updated and consolidated fees will streamline wastewater management processes and enhance compliance with environmental standards. However, critics may express concern over the financial burden imposed on municipalities, particularly those already grappling with tight budgets. The changes to the descriptions of sewers may also spark debate among stakeholders in the wastewater management field, as professionals seek clarity in regulations affecting their responsibilities.
Relative to a report by the department of energy on the effectiveness of the system benefits charge and relative to surface water setbacks for landfills and relative to water quality.