Prohibiting municipalities from banning use of grounds maintenance and snow and ice removal equipment with internal combustion engines.
Impact
The implementation of HB 453 would significantly alter existing local regulations regarding the use of grounds maintenance and snow removal equipment. By preventing municipalities from enacting bans, the bill aims to facilitate the continued use of internal combustion engine-powered equipment, which is often favored for its efficiency in various weather conditions. This change could resonate with businesses and individual operators within the municipalities who rely on such equipment for their operations. Conversely, the bill may generate concerns related to environmental impacts given the emissions associated with internal combustion engines.
Summary
House Bill 453 seeks to prohibit municipalities from banning the use of grounds maintenance and snow and ice removal equipment powered by internal combustion engines. The bill specifically amends RSA 41, establishing that local governing bodies cannot restrict individuals from operating such equipment within their jurisdictions. However, it does allow for municipalities to vote on whether they wish to prohibit the purchase of this type of equipment by the municipality itself, should a majority of citizens support such a prohibition.
Sentiment
Reactions to HB 453 appear mixed among stakeholders. Proponents of the bill, often from trade associations or sectors reliant on grounds maintenance and snow removal, argue that the legislation supports operational continuity and addresses economic concerns, particularly in areas reliant on effective maintenance during adverse weather conditions. Meanwhile, opponents, including environmental activists and some local leaders, argue that the bill undermines local control and diminishes efforts to moves towards sustainable alternatives, stressing the importance of local jurisdictions having the authority to make decisions that impact their communities directly.
Contention
A significant point of contention surrounding HB 453 lies in the balance of authority between state and local governments. By restricting municipalities' ability to legislate on this matter, critics express concern that the bill could result in communities being forced to use outdated or environmentally harmful equipment against their will. Moreover, the provision allowing municipalities to vote on purchasing equipment introduces a procedural aspect that some view as inadequate, potentially limiting the effectiveness of local regulation and not fully addressing community-specific needs regarding equipment use and environmental responsibilities.
Prohibiting the use by the governor of emergency orders concerning elections procedures without the written consent of the majority and minority leaders of the house of representatives and senate.