Relative to establishing causes of actions against educational institutions that charge excessive tuition rates.
If enacted, this bill will affect state statutes concerning education financing and consumer rights, potentially leading to significant reforms in how educational programs structure their tuition fees. Educational institutions found to charge excessive rates could face both criminal and civil liabilities, ultimately holding them accountable for their pricing strategies. The act may compel institutions to more closely align their tuition rates with the financial realities of their graduates, promoting a more equitable system where prospective students can gauge the value of their investments in education based on future earnings potential.
House Bill 722, also known as the New Hampshire Predatory College Degree Consumer Protection Act, is designed to establish legal grounds for actions against educational institutions that impose excessive tuition rates. The bill introduces both criminal penalties and civil rights of action aimed at protecting consumers from being charged unreasonable tuition fees for post-secondary degree programs. The legislation defines 'unreasonable rates' as those that exceed a specified financial threshold relative to graduates' earnings, effectively linking educational costs to financial viability for students entering their respective job markets.
The sentiment surrounding HB 722 appears to lean towards consumer protection and advocating for student rights, garnering support from those who view excessive tuition as a predatory practice. Advocates argue that this bill is crucial in ensuring that students are not financially crippled by unmanageable debt resulting from overpriced education. However, some educational institutions express concerns over the bill's implications, emphasizing the complexities involved in calculating tuition rates relative to graduate salaries, which may lead to increased operational costs and compliance burdens.
A notable point of contention regarding HB 722 is the practicality of its enforcement. Institutions like the Community College System of New Hampshire and the University System of New Hampshire have raised concerns about the feasibility of tracking and demonstrating compliance with the earnings thresholds set by the bill. They argue that the process may involve significant administrative costs and require extensive earnings data collection, which is often complicated by the diverse jurisdictions in which graduates reside. This could potentially lead to legal challenges or unintended consequences for institutions striving to comply with new regulations.