"Murphy's Law"; nullifies Governor's order, rule, or regulation to address declared emergency, or relevant portion thereof, when Governor violates same; creates affirmative defense to prosecution for same violation committed by Governor.
If enacted, this bill would establish a precedent that could significantly reshape the state's governance framework during emergencies. Local entities and citizens would gain a new layer of protection against potential overreach by executive orders linked to state emergencies. However, it also raises questions regarding the effectiveness and practicality of emergency management, as nullifying rules could create chaotic situations during critical times when swift state action is often necessary.
Assembly Bill A1044, designated as 'Murphy's Law,' proposes to nullify any orders, rules, or regulations issued by the Governor during a declared state of emergency if the Governor violates their own mandates. This legislation acknowledges the need for accountability at the highest levels of executive authority and aims to provide an affirmative defense for individuals prosecuted for violations of such orders if it can be demonstrated that the Governor also committed the same violation. Such a provision would fundamentally alter how state emergency powers are implemented and enforced.
The bill has sparked considerable debate among legislators and constituents alike. Proponents argue that it will prevent hypocrisy in governance and reinforce the rule of law, ensuring that all individuals, including those in power, are held accountable for their actions. On the contrary, critics have expressed concerns that such legislation might hinder the government's ability to respond decisively and efficiently to emergencies, particularly if the fear of nullifying their own orders leads to indecision or excessive caution on the part of the Governor.