New Jersey Assembly Bill A119

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22
• Report Pass: 9/22/22
• Engrossed: 10/3/22
• Refer: 10/3/22
• Report Pass: 6/12/23

Caption

Provides for retained eligibility for members of NJ National Guard or reserve component called to active federal military service who met fire department maximum age requirement at closing date of civil service examination.

Impact

If enacted, A119 will align the treatment of military personnel with that of veterans as it pertains to employment eligibility in civil service roles. This bill is aimed at ensuring that those who serve the country are not disadvantaged in their post-service job opportunities, specifically in public service roles that have age limits. By allowing these service members to return to the employment lists without penalty, this legislation also acknowledges the sacrifices made by military personnel and their right to pursue civilian careers upon returning from duty.

Summary

Assembly Bill A119 seeks to amend existing New Jersey law to retain eligibility for members of the New Jersey National Guard and reserve components of the armed forces who are called to active duty and were on a civil service employment list prior to their deployment. This legislation recognizes that military obligations can disrupt civilian career paths, particularly in competitive fields such as firefighting and law enforcement. The bill stipulates that these individuals will be deemed to meet the maximum age requirements for appointment in fire departments if they were compliant at the time of the closure of the civil service examination from which their name was initially placed on the list.

Contention

While the bill appears to have broad support, discussions around A119 may touch upon issues related to the labor market and age discrimination. Critics may argue that relaxing maximum age requirements could create competitive imbalances in civil service sectors, while supporters contend that protecting the rights of service members is paramount. Additionally, it raises questions regarding the longevity and viability of age restrictions in sectors that are under strict physical performance requirements, thereby soliciting a broader conversation about inclusivity versus competitiveness in public service roles.