New Jersey Assembly Bill A4791

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/17/22
• Refer: 10/17/22
• Report Pass: 6/15/23
• Report Pass: 12/4/23
• Engrossed: 12/7/23
• Refer: 1/2/24
• Report Pass: 1/4/24
• Engrossed: 1/8/24
• Enrolled: 1/8/24
• Chaptered: 1/16/24
• Passed: 1/16/24

Caption

Establishes "Resiliency and Environmental System Investment Charge Program."

Impact

If enacted, A4791 significantly alters the landscape of utility regulation within New Jersey. It grants utilities the ability to recover certain costs, particularly those linked to environmental compliance and infrastructure improvements, by implementing a charge on customer bills. The bill caps the maximum charge a utility can pass along to customers, ensuring that increases in bills are managed and predictable over time. This prospective structure could lead to improvements in water and wastewater infrastructures, ultimately affecting service reliability and quality for New Jersey residents.

Summary

Assembly Bill A4791 establishes the 'Resiliency and Environmental System Investment Charge Program' (RESIC) aimed at facilitating the recovery of costs associated with utilities' investments in projects designed to enhance infrastructure resiliency and environmental protection. Through the RESIC, utilities can seek recovery of costs incurred while meeting federal and state compliance requirements. The bill outlines mechanisms for cost calculation, approval processes for eligible projects, and provisions for reflecting associated fees on customer utility bills.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding A4791 seems generally supportive among utilities who view it as a necessary measure to facilitate investment in sustainable infrastructure. However, some concerns have been raised by consumer advocacy groups who fear that a new fee structure could lead to higher utility bills without adequate transparency or consumer protections. The bill’s explanation includes provisions for public hearings, which indicate a legislative intent to gain community input, potentially softening criticism from detractors concerned about cost implications for consumers.

Contention

The primary point of contention revolves around the balance of cost recovery versus consumer impact. Critics of A4791 may worry about the implications for household utility costs, questioning whether the benefits of enhanced infrastructure justify the potential financial burden on customers. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the oversight of projects eligible for charge recovery, as well as the process by which utilities may estimate and justify their costs to the Board of Public Utilities.