New Jersey Senate Bill S345

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24
• Chaptered: 1/9/24
• Passed: 1/9/24

Caption

Establishes "Resiliency and Environmental System Investment Charge Program."

Impact

The introduction of the RESIC program is set to have significant implications for state utility regulations and financial management practices. It provides a structured approach for utilities to recoup expenses related to enhancing infrastructure without needing to immediately pass on every cost to consumers. This could facilitate more proactive maintenance and upgrades in utility operations that might otherwise be deferred due to budget constraints, ultimately leading to improved service reliability and environmental compliance. However, utility companies will have to be transparent and accountable for the costs they incur under this mechanism, as they are required to specify each customer's charges based on the RESIC rate on their utility bills.

Summary

Senate Bill S345 establishes the 'Resiliency and Environmental System Investment Charge Program' (RESIC) aimed at providing a financial mechanism for water and wastewater utilities to recover costs associated with investments in maintaining and enhancing system resiliency, environmental safety, and public health. This bill allows utilities to petition the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) for approval of a RESIC rate, which may involve submitting a foundational filing that outlines the expected costs and benefits of various projects aimed at improving water and wastewater infrastructure. The bill imposes a cap on the amount that can be recovered through this charge, limiting it to five percent of the utility's total annual revenue, which serves to protect consumers from excessive rate increases.

Contention

While the bill is positioned as a necessary step for improving state utility infrastructure, there are concerns regarding its potential for increased charges on consumer bills. Critics worry that the RESIC rate mechanism could lead to higher overall utility costs at a time when consumers are already burdened by various economic pressures. Proponents argue that infrastructure improvements are essential for environmental compliance and long-term sustainability of water resources, while opponents fear that the regulatory oversight and mechanisms for rate increases may not adequately protect consumers from unjustified price hikes.