New Jersey Assembly Bill A576

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Establishes Climate Change Mitigation and Resilience Financing Program in NJ Infrastructure Bank; imposes per-kilowatt hour charge on electric energy consumption to finance climate change mitigation and resilience projects.

Impact

If enacted, A576 would significantly amend existing state laws regarding environmental financing and public utilities. Specifically, it authorizes the NJIB to issue bonds – termed 'New Jersey Climate Bonds' – to generate funds for climate projects. The proceeds from these bonds would be deposited into a specially created State Climate Change Mitigation and Resilience Bank Fund, ensuring that the funds are allocated specifically for climate-related projects and cannot be co-mingled with other infrastructural funds. Additionally, the bill requires the Board of Public Utilities to implement a non-bypassable charge on electric utility consumers, beginning at $0.0003 per kilowatt-hour, which can reduce as renewable energy goals are achieved.

Summary

Assembly Bill A576 aims to establish the Climate Change Mitigation and Resilience Financing Program within the New Jersey Infrastructure Bank (NJIB) and imposes a charge on electric utility customers to fund the initiative. This program is designed to support low-interest loans and other financial assistance for projects aimed at mitigating climate change and enhancing resilience against its impacts. Such projects include the development of renewable energy sources, energy efficiency improvements, carbon capture and sequestration efforts, as well as infrastructure projects that protect public health and the environment from climate-related threats.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding A576 include the financial implications for consumers due to the imposed charges. While supporters argue that funding for climate mitigation is essential for long-term sustainability and public safety, critics may contend that any additional charges could burden consumers, particularly if energy prices are already high. Other concerns might involve how the prioritization of projects is determined and whether the program adequately addresses local environmental needs while enforcing a state-level solution. Opponents may also worry about potential government overreach in requiring compliance from utility providers and customers alike.