Urges President and Congress of United States to restore "net neutrality" in federal law.
AR23 does not alter state law directly; rather, it serves as a formal request to federal authorities, emphasizing New Jersey's position on a national issue concerning telecommunications policy.
The resolution highlights the concern that the repeal of net neutrality regulations could lead to a scenario where a few dominant ISPs could prioritize their content or that of associated services, thereby harming smaller businesses and consumers. It emphasizes the role that unrestricted Internet access plays in today's information economy, particularly for small businesses that may lack the financial resources to compete for prioritized service. AR23 effectively calls on federal lawmakers to reconsider the implications of these deregulations and advocate for the interests of a broader public reliant on equitable Internet access.
Assembly Resolution No. 23 (AR23) urges the President and Congress of the United States to restore the principle of 'net neutrality' in federal law. This resolution is a response to changes made by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in December 2017, which rescinded previous regulations that classified Internet service providers (ISPs) under Title II of the Communications Act. The reclassification initially allowed the FCC to enforce rules that prevented ISPs from discriminating against content or creating paid 'fast lanes'. AR23 argues that net neutrality is vital for maintaining a free and open Internet, facilitating equal access to information, and fostering a competitive marketplace for ideas and commerce.
The main points of contention surrounding AR23 stem from the debate over the role of regulation in technology markets. Proponents of restoring net neutrality argue that it would protect consumers and ensure fair competition by preventing ISPs from engaging in anti-competitive practices. Conversely, those opposing the regulations suggest that less oversight could benefit innovation and consumer choice in ISP services. The resolution references historical legislative frameworks, including the Telecommunications Act of 1996, asserting that the intent behind those laws was to maintain an open platform for information and commerce, something that may be jeopardized by the current lack of net neutrality.