New Jersey Senate Bill S2868

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/20/22
• Refer: 6/20/22
• Report Pass: 6/27/22

Caption

Specifies circumstances when voter will be removed from permanent vote by mail status and when ballot will be sent to primary address; requires educational campaign; makes appropriation of $5 million.

Impact

The enactment of S2868 will alter existing state election laws concerning mail-in voting. By clarifying the criteria for maintaining permanent mail-in voting status, the bill aims to streamline the voting process while ensuring that those who opt for mail-in ballots remain engaged. However, the statutory alterations may also complicate the voting procedure for some voters who might inadvertently lose their mail-in ballot status due to inactivity over an extended period.

Summary

Senate Bill S2868 focuses on the administration of mail-in voting in New Jersey. It specifies the circumstances under which voters may be removed from permanent vote by mail status, indicating that if a voter fails to vote by mail for four consecutive years, they will no longer receive mail-in ballots unless they request them. The bill also mandates that ballots should be sent to the primary address of the voter and includes provisions to educate voters on these changes, supported by a $5 million appropriation from the state’s general fund for county educational campaigns.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding S2868 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the updates to the mail-in voting process enhance accountability and engagement among voters, while critics express concerns that removing voters from the permanent mail-in list could disenfranchise those who may not be aware of the new rules. As such, the educational component of the bill is seen as crucial in mitigating potential confusion and ensuring that voters are informed about their rights and responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the risk of disenfranchising voters who may not actively seek out the information regarding changes in their voting status. Critics worry that the requirement for a proactive approach could disproportionately affect marginalized communities, while proponents argue that these measures will help maintain the integrity of the electoral process by ensuring that only engaged voters receive mail-in ballots. Ultimately, the balance between maintaining voter rights and ensuring timely and accurate electoral participation is the central theme of the debate surrounding SB S2868.