Criminalizes unlawful occupancy of dwellings.
The bill outlines three distinct criminal offenses: housebreaking, unlawful occupancy, and unlawful reentry, each classified as a crime of the fourth degree. Under the proposed law, individuals who forcibly enter uninhabited or vacant homes without the permission of the owner can be charged with housebreaking, while those who take up residence in such properties without authorization are guilty of unlawful occupancy. The bill further stipulates that reentering a property after an eviction is also a criminal offense, reinforcing property owners' rights and streamlining the eviction process.
Senate Bill S3613, introduced in New Jersey's 220th Legislature, aims to criminalize unlawful occupancy of dwellings, an act commonly referred to as squatting. This legislative change seeks to establish clear legal boundaries around the rights of property owners regarding unauthorized entry and occupancy of vacant residences. Specifically, the bill defines various terms related to unlawful entry and sets forth conditions under which individuals could be prosecuted for related offenses, which were previously not considered criminal acts in the state.
If enacted, the law will take effect six months following its passage, allowing time for public awareness and adjustment for both property owners and individuals potentially affected by the new regulations. The implication of this bill reflects a broader trend in property rights legislation, particularly in response to urban housing crises, where issues of land use and occupancy rights are increasingly coming under scrutiny.
Notably, this bill is significant as it shifts the legal premise under which property owners can protect their rights against unlawful occupancy. Currently, property owners often face lengthy and complicated legal processes to evict squatters, requiring court intervention. This bill offers a potential remedy for property owners, but it may raise concerns about the treatment of individuals experiencing homelessness or housing instability, who might be disproportionately affected by such legislation. Critics may argue that the criminalization of squatting could exacerbate social issues associated with homelessness.