New Jersey Assembly Bill A379

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Repeals the "Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote."

Impact

The passage of A379 would have significant implications on how New Jersey's electoral votes are assigned in presidential elections. Currently, the national popular vote agreement is perceived by some as undermining the voting power of New Jersey residents by not reflecting the decision of voters in the state. Rejecting this system could serve to enhance the weight of state-level votes in presidential elections and counteract what proponents of the bill describe as a potential disenfranchisement of local voters. The amendment of various statutory provisions to eliminate references to the agreement further solidifies New Jersey’s commitment to a more localized electoral process.

Summary

Assembly Bill A379 proposes the repeal of the 'Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote' established under New Jersey law through P.L.2007, c.334. The agreement mandates that New Jersey's electoral votes be allocated to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote, rather than the candidate who wins the popular vote in New Jersey. By repealing this agreement, A379 seeks to restore the traditional winner-take-all approach currently in use by the state, reinforcing the principle that each state's electors should align with its own voters' preferences during elections.

Contention

Despite support from some quarters, A379 opens up a contentious dialogue regarding electoral practices. Critics argue that repealing the national popular vote agreement could potentially isolate New Jersey from a broader, cooperative voting initiative aimed at reforming the electoral college system across the United States. Proponents against the bill frame it as a necessary step to ensure that New Jersey voters’ voices are not overshadowed by national trends. The bill illustrates the ongoing debate between maintaining state sovereignty in electoral decisions versus participating in collaborative national voting reforms.