California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1320

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
7/17/17  
Refer
7/17/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Vetoed
10/5/17  

Caption

State prisons: private, for-profit administration services.

Impact

The main impact of AB 1320 is to restrict the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from utilizing private, for-profit prisons outside the state, a move that advocates say could lead to increased oversight of prisoner treatment and conditions. By limiting the dependency on out-of-state facilities, the bill seeks to enhance accountability and potentially improve correctional outcomes. The legislation is part of a broader push against the privatization of correctional services, which critics argue has led to profit-driven policies at the expense of inmate welfare.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1320, introduced by Assembly Member Bonta, aims to amend existing provisions of the Penal Code concerning the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's ability to contract with private, for-profit prison facilities located outside of California. The bill specifically prohibits the department from entering into contracts with such facilities after January 1, 2018, and from renewing any existing contracts after January 1, 2020. Additionally, it establishes that, effective January 1, 2021, no state prison inmate or individual under the jurisdiction of the department may be housed in these out-of-state, for-profit prisons.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1320 appears to be generally positive among reform advocates who see it as a step toward dismantling the profit-driven prison industry that may neglect inmates' rights and welfare. However, there are concerns among some lawmakers and stakeholders about the potential strain on in-state resources, as local facilities may face increased pressure to accommodate a higher inmate population. The debate highlights a significant divide between those who prioritize ethical considerations in correctional management and those who focus on operational capacity and public safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention associated with AB 1320 revolve around the balancing act between budgetary constraints and humane treatment of inmates. Opponents of the bill argue that implementing the changes could increase costs and logistics challenges for California's correctional system, while proponents assert that the regulations are necessary to ensure humane treatment and avoid exploitation inherent in the private prison model. The bill's introduction and passage reflects growing trends in criminal justice reform aiming to reduce reliance on profit-centric incarceration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV SB815

Permitting access to funding for public water utilities subject to PSC's jurisdiction

WV HB3308

Relating to the termination of the authority’s certificate of need program

WV HB2007

Repeal Certificate of Need Process

WV SB453

Repealing certificate of need process

CA AB32

Detention facilities: private, for-profit administration services.

TX SB1422

Relating to coordinated county transportation authorities; creating an offense.

CA SB94

Public Safety: omnibus.

CA AB94

Postsecondary education trailer bill.