New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A879

Introduced
1/9/24  

Caption

Requires public and nonpublic schools to test for and remediate lead in drinking water, and disclose test results.

Impact

If enacted, A879 will significantly affect state laws concerning environmental health standards within educational institutions. The legislation specifies that schools must take immediate action if any lead levels exceed regulatory thresholds, which may include shutting down water sources or implementing remediation efforts such as installing filters, repairing plumbing, and providing alternative water sources. This proactive approach is designed to prevent long-term exposure to lead, a known health hazard that can adversely affect children’s development. The DEP is also tasked with supporting schools by providing necessary technical guidance and information on certified testing laboratories, thereby facilitating compliance with the bill's provisions.

Summary

Assembly Bill A879 mandates both public and nonpublic schools in New Jersey to conduct regular testing for lead in drinking water outlets. The bill aims to enhance student safety by ensuring that schools periodically evaluate the quality of drinking water available to students and staff. Schools must adhere to technical guidance provided by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with initial tests to be completed within 90 days of the bill's enactment, followed by subsequent testing every five years or as deemed necessary by the DEP. This requirement underscores New Jersey's commitment to safeguarding the health of its school populations in light of growing concerns over lead contamination in drinking water.

Contention

As with similar legislative measures, there are potential points of contention regarding the implementation of A879. Concerns may arise regarding the costs associated with testing and remediation, particularly for smaller or financially constrained schools. Critics might argue that the financial burden could strain school district budgets, leading to calls for state funding or support mechanisms. Furthermore, ensuring uniform compliance across diverse school environments presents another challenge, especially in rural areas where resources may be limited. Advocates for children's health, however, emphasize that the potential long-term health benefits of lead-free drinking water far outweigh the initial costs, framing the bill as a necessary investment in public health.

Companion Bills

NJ S1648

Carry Over Requires public and nonpublic schools to test for and remediate lead in drinking water, and disclose test results.

NJ A3217

Carry Over Requires public and nonpublic schools to test for and remediate lead in drinking water, and disclose test results.

Similar Bills

NJ A4546

Requires school districts to include environmental sustainability plan in long-range facilities plan.

NJ A2101

Requires school districts to include environmental sustainability plan in long-range facilities plan.

NJ S434

Requires school districts to include environmental sustainability plan in long-range facilities plan.

NJ S215

Requires school districts to include environmental sustainability plan in long-range facilities plan.

NJ A3217

Requires public and nonpublic schools to test for and remediate lead in drinking water, and disclose test results.

NJ S1648

Requires public and nonpublic schools to test for and remediate lead in drinking water, and disclose test results.

CA AB1153

San Diego Unified Port District.

NJ A5301

Requires DEP to study feasibility of using alternative water supply source when perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant level.