New Jersey Assembly Bill ACR82

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Proposes amendment to State Constitution to limit members of Senate to three successive terms and members of General Assembly to five successive terms.

Impact

If enacted, ACR82 would fundamentally alter the landscape of New Jersey's legislative process. By limiting the number of successive terms that legislators can serve, the resolution aims to prevent the development of a politically entrenched class within the Senate and General Assembly. This amendment would apply to those elected in the general election of 2011 and onwards, thus exempting current officeholders from these new restrictions until their terms are up. Advocates of the bill argue that such limitations will enhance democratic participation and responsiveness, as new legislators may bring diverse experiences and viewpoints.

Summary

ACR82 proposes a significant amendment to the New Jersey Constitution aimed at implementing term limits for members of the state legislature. Specifically, it seeks to restrict Senators to three successive terms and members of the General Assembly to five successive terms. This proposal reflects a growing movement across various states to impose term limits on elected officials to increase accountability and reduce the risks of political entrenchment. The intent behind these changes is to promote fresh ideas and perspectives in legislative matters by ensuring turnover among elected representatives.

Contention

The proposal may stir contention among various stakeholders. Supporters argue that term limits can combat stagnation in policy-making and make elected officials more accountable to their constituents. Conversely, opponents might raise concerns over the loss of experienced legislators who have built up institutional knowledge and expertise. Critics may also worry that frequent turnover could diminish the effectiveness of the legislative process by removing seasoned lawmakers who understand the complexities of governance. Ultimately, the debate around ACR82 highlights the tension between ensuring political accountability and the value of experience in public office.