New Jersey Senate Bill S202

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

"Water Resources Protection Trust Fund Act"; establishes user fee on water consumption and diversion; utilizes fee revenue for water quality, supply, and infrastructure projects.

Impact

The legislation is poised to significantly affect state laws by expanding the financial resources available for critical water infrastructure projects. It underscores the legislative intent to utilize funds not only for immediate needs but also to ensure the longevity and safety of the state's water supply systems. Notably, the bill mandates that financial plans outlining the use of these funds and priority projects be submitted annually to the Legislature for transparency and accountability. The bill aims to address deficiencies in current water infrastructure, mitigating risks associated with aging systems, such as lead contamination and service interruptions.

Summary

Senate Bill S202, known as the Water Resources Protection Trust Fund Act, aims to address New Jersey's growing concerns surrounding water quality, supply, and infrastructure. The bill establishes a user fee system: a $0.40 fee on every 1,000 gallons of water consumed from public community water systems and a similar fee for water diversions. The revenue generated from these fees will be allocated to a newly created Water Resources Protection Trust Fund, which will finance various water quality projects, infrastructure-related initiatives, and efforts to mitigate drought conditions across the state. The bill emphasizes the need for a sustainable funding source for long-term water resource preservation and infrastructure improvements.

Contention

While proponents argue that the establishment of this trust fund and corresponding user fees are vital for safeguarding water resources and ensuring clean drinking water, there may be contention regarding the implementation and financial burden placed on water consumers and providers. Opponents might raise concerns about how these fees could impact low-income households and the potential for increased financial strain on public water systems. Furthermore, questions may arise surrounding the efficacy of fund allocation, transparency in project funding decisions, and equity in access to safe water across different communities in New Jersey.