New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S479

Introduced
1/9/24  

Caption

Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

Impact

The implementation of S479 is designed to streamline the legal process for property owners facing meritless claims against their properties. By providing a mechanism for quicker dismissal of actions that have not progressed, the bill is expected to reduce lengthy legal disputes and alleviate the burden on defendants who might otherwise remain entangled in unresolved litigation. The immediate effect of the bill will apply to all new actions filed after its passage and will also influence existing cases that have not yet been finally adjudicated, thereby allowing a broader scope of impact for defendants.

Summary

Senate Bill S479 aims to amend the New Jersey statute N.J.S.2A:15-10, which governs civil actions associated with notices of lis pendens. The key provision of this bill is to empower defendants in such actions to move for the dismissal of cases with prejudice if plaintiffs demonstrate ongoing failure to diligently prosecute their claims. This ability to dismiss is contingent upon the notice of lis pendens being previously discharged for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute or to establish a likelihood of judgment in their favor, with a requirement that this discharge has been in effect for at least six months prior to the dismissal motion.

Contention

Debate surrounding S479 may arise over concerns of balance between defending property rights and ensuring access to justice for plaintiffs who may have valid claims but face procedural hurdles. Critics may argue that the bill could inadvertently encourage frivolous dismissals and discourage legitimate lawsuits based on fear of quick dismissal. Proponents, on the other hand, tout the bill as a necessary reform to protect property owners from baseless litigation that can freeze real estate transactions and cause financial distress.

Notable_points

Notably, the bill is poised to empower courts to act on motions for dismissal if defendants can demonstrate the prerequisites of prior discharge of lis pendens and continued failure to prosecute by the plaintiff. Furthermore, the prompt enactment of the bill aims to address timely real estate disputes effectively, fostering a legal environment that is more conducive to property management and ownership.

Companion Bills

NJ A783

Same As Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

NJ S1178

Carry Over Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

NJ A2173

Carry Over Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

Similar Bills

NJ A2173

Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

NJ S1178

Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

NJ A783

Provides for court dismissal, with prejudice, of civil actions for which lis pendens notices are filed under certain circumstances.

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

KS SB458

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, providing limitations on state and local law enforcement agency requests for federal adoption of a seizure under the act, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence forfeiture proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence, authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants and requiring the Kansas bureau of investigation to submit forfeiture fund financial reports to the legislature.

KS SB237

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that property is subject to forfeiture, remitting proceeds to the state general fund and requiring law enforcement agencies to make forfeiture reports more frequently.

KS HB2396

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that property is subject to forfeiture, remitting proceeds to the state general fund and requiring law enforcement agencies to make forfeiture reports more frequently.

KS HB2380

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture, remitting proceeds from civil asset forfeiture to the state general fund, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property, making certain property ineligible for forfeiture, providing persons involved in forfeiture proceedings representation by counsel and the ability to demand a jury trial and allowing a person to request a hearing on whether forfeiture is excessive.