Legislative Session Changes, Ca
The amendment would also remove existing restrictions that limit the types of bills considered in even-numbered years to primarily budget-related matters. If approved, this would allow for a broader range of legislative issues to be debated and enacted during those years. Moreover, the proposed changes would explicitly provide for the consideration of veto overrides during special or extraordinary sessions, which could enhance the legislature's authority to address previous gubernatorial vetoes during such sessions.
HJR9 is a joint resolution aimed at amending Article 4, Section 5 of the New Mexico Constitution. The proposed changes would primarily alter the length of regular legislative sessions. According to the current proposal, each regular session would be limited to forty-five days, regardless of whether it occurs during an odd or even-numbered year. The amendment intends to standardize session durations to manage legislative activities more efficiently and reduce the frequency of extended sessions that could hinder legislative effectiveness.
This resolution has the potential to spark significant debate. Proponents assert that by allowing more flexibility and encouraging a more well-rounded legislative agenda in even-numbered years, the amendment could lead to more responsive governance. However, opponents may raise concerns about the implications of shortening the session duration, fearing it could limit lawmakers' ability to address urgent issues thoroughly. Furthermore, allowing for veto overrides during special sessions may be seen as an overreach that could shift the balance of power between the legislature and the executive branch.