Proposes to amend the Nevada Constitution to remove the constitutional provisions governing the election and duties of the Board of Regents of the State University and to authorize the Legislature to provide by statute for the governance of the State University and for the auditing of public institutions of higher education in this State. (BDR C-944)
Impact
The proposed amendments would solidify legislative control over the operations of the State University, thereby diminishing the Board of Regents' powers as a constitutional body. This transition is intended to promote greater accountability and ensure that the Board operates under statutes determined by the Legislature. By removing the Board of Regents' constitutional status, the proposal envisions a system where legislative bodies can enact changes more effectively regarding higher education governance, including the appointment of board members and the management of university affairs.
Summary
SJR7A is a resolution proposing amendments to the Nevada Constitution that would significantly alter the governance of the State University and related public institutions of higher education. The bill seeks to remove the constitutional provisions that currently govern the election and duties of the Board of Regents, shifting the authority to legislate and oversee these functions solely to the Nevada Legislature. The core objective is to enhance legislative oversight and accountability within the governance structure of higher education in Nevada.
Sentiment
Discussion surrounding SJR7A is mixed, reflecting concerns about the balance of power between state control and institutional autonomy. Proponents support the bill as a necessary reform to increase accountability in higher education governance, arguing that greater legislative oversight can lead to improved educational outcomes. Conversely, opponents express concerns that stripping the Board of Regents of its constitutional status could undermine the independence essential for effective university governance and may lead to political influences on educational management.
Contention
Notable points of contention arise from fears that SJR7A could lead to excessive political intervention in university affairs, potentially impacting academic freedom and the governance autonomy traditionally associated with higher education institutions. The debate further highlights the importance of establishing a governance framework that safeguards the interests of educational institutions while ensuring accountability to the public.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a student member of the board of regents of a state institution of higher education or state university system to serve a term that differs from the terms served by the other members of the board.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a student member of the board of regents of a public institution of higher education or public university system to serve a term that differs from the terms served by the other members of the board.
Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of funds to support the capital needs of educational programs offered by certain component institutions of the Texas State University System.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
(Constitutional Amendment) Requires legislative approval of a proposed constitutional amendment in two sessions before being submitted to the electors for ratification