Nevada Assembly Bill AB287

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Report Pass: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/14/25
• Failed: 6/2/25

Caption

Revises provisions relating to elections. (BDR 24-202)

Impact

If enacted, AB 287 will significantly modify current state laws governing election recounts. The bill would align recount requirements more closely with tight electoral margins, thereby making it easier and less expensive for candidates to request one in close races. Additionally, by requiring the state to cover costs for certain recounts, the bill promotes equitable access to revoting processes, especially beneficial for candidates in close races who might otherwise be deterred by financial barriers. This could lead to more candidates feeling confident in contesting election results where they suspect inaccuracies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 287 aims to revise provisions relating to elections, particularly focusing on the processes involved in demanding and conducting recounts. The bill proposes that a defeated candidate can call for a recount if the vote margin is 5 percent or less. Moreover, it mandates a recount at no cost if the vote difference is 0.25 percent or less under certain conditions. These changes are intended to bolster voter confidence in the electoral process and improve access to recounts, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability in electoral outcomes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 287 appears to be supportive among advocates for electoral reform and voter access. Proponents argue that facilitating recounts and reducing financial barriers enhances electoral fairness and integrity. However, there may be opposition from those who believe that the bill could lead to frivolous recount demands, thereby complicating the election process. This highlights an ongoing tension in electoral law between ensuring access to justice and maintaining efficient election administration.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the potential for an increased number of recount requests, which could burden election officials and disrupt the electoral timeline. Critics may argue that the provision for automatic recounts under tight margins could be misused, while supporters counter that it is a critical step in ensuring that all votes are accurately counted. Additionally, the establishment of the Voter Access Grant Program, meant to support election administration and improve voter access, may face scrutiny regarding its implementation and funding sources.