Urges Congress to call a convention of the states to propose certain amendments to the United States Constitution. (BDR R-546)
If passed, SJR3 would not have a direct fiscal impact on the state or local governments but would instead focus on altering the relationship between state and federal powers. Its passage would represent an official stance by Nevada's legislature advocating for a more decentralized government structure and greater accountability for federal officials. The resolution indicates a desire for states to reclaim authority that proponents of the bill believe has been unlawfully taken by the federal government.
SJR3, known as the Senate Joint Resolution 3, urges Congress to call a convention of states for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The proposed amendments seek to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and restrict the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress. This resolution reflects a growing sentiment among certain legislators who believe that the federal government has overreached its authority and encroached on state rights.
The sentiment surrounding SJR3 appears to be supportive among Republican legislators and those aligned with states' rights philosophies, who view it as a necessary action to prevent federal overreach. In contrast, there could be apprehensions or criticisms raised by those who consider such a convention risky, fearing that it could lead to unintended consequences or revisions that might undermine existing constitutional protections.
Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the potential consequences of calling a convention of states. Critics of this approach worry that once a convention is convened, it could result in broader amendments that may compromise significant constitutional rights. The debate emphasizes the need for balance between necessary reforms to federal governance and the safeguarding of civil liberties enshrined in the Constitution.