Requires a motion picture theater that offers more than ten motion picture showings per week to provide scheduled showings of motion pictures with open motion picture captioning such that at least one quarter of all showings of a motion picture with four or more showings during a one-week time period shall have open motion picture captioning; provides exceptions and penalties for violations.
If enacted, S02269 would amend the General Business Law, aiming to enhance accessibility in theaters. With mandated open captioning, the bill addresses the need for more inclusive entertainment options for individuals with hearing impairments. The specified requirement for open captioning during peak hours and total showings is intended to balance audience experiences and increase accessibility across a broader range of showtimes.
The bill S02269 aims to require motion picture theaters in New York that offer more than ten showings per week to provide scheduled showings of films with open motion picture captioning. This would apply to any motion picture that has four or more showings during a one-week period. Specifically, the legislation stipulates that at least one quarter of these showings must feature open captioning, which displays on-screen dialogue and other non-speech information, fostering inclusivity for hearing-impaired individuals.
Discussions surrounding S02269 have highlighted debates on balancing business interests with accessibility provisions. Some proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step for inclusivity, while opponents may raise concerns about the financial burden it places on theaters to comply with additional regulations. The bill also includes provisions regarding penalties for non-compliance, which could further polarize discussions among stakeholders in the entertainment industry.
Notably, S02269 features a preemption clause which states that municipalities with existing ordinances requiring open captioning that are equal to or more stringent than the bill will not be subject to its provisions. This aspect potentially minimizes conflicts between state law and local ordinances, although it could lead to variations in compliance expectations depending on local governance.