Ohio 2025-2026 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB214

Caption

Require Medicaid, health insurers report on prior authorization

Impact

The implications of HB 214 are particularly notable in how it alters current practices related to prior authorization. Insurers and health plans will need to adjust their policies to comply with these new requirements, which may lead to a more favorable environment for healthcare providers and patients. The bill mandates that insurers report on how prior authorizations are managed, including timing and approval rates, fostering transparency and accountability within health systems.

Summary

House Bill 214 introduces significant amendments to existing sections of the Ohio Revised Code, specifically focusing on prior authorization requirements associated with healthcare coverage. This bill aims to streamline processes for health care practitioners and patients alike by mitigating the administrative burden associated with prior authorizations. Starting from 2027, if a health care provider consistently meets a high approval rate on prior authorization requests, they will no longer be required to seek prior authorization for similar services, thereby improving access to necessary medical treatments without delays.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 214 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters, especially within the healthcare community, view the bill favorably as it could lead to improved patient outcomes by reducing delays in receiving necessary medical services. Conversely, there are concerns expressed regarding the administrative adjustments needed by insurers and the overall impact on healthcare costs. Stakeholders are divided on whether such measures could inadvertently limit the oversight necessary to manage medical necessity effectively.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention regard the balance between easing access to care and maintaining effective controls on medical necessity. Critics argue that less stringent prior authorization processes could lead to inappropriate medical spending, while proponents assert that the bill is essential for enhancing the patient experience and reducing needless bureaucratic delays. Additionally, there are concerns on how implementation will affect healthcare budgets as insurers navigate the changes outlined in the bill, leading to a debate about long-term sustainability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OH HB220

Regards health insurance, Medicaid prior authorization

FL H1297

Electronic Prescribing

VA HB1898

Optometry; TPA-Formulary; TPA-Formulary Committee; dissolution.

VA SB1081

Optometry; dissolves TPA-Formulary and TPA-Formulary Committee.

AZ HB2291

Opioids; containers; labeling; requirements; repeal

WV SB833

Excluding pharmaceutical medication from prior authorization gold card process

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.

OH HB52

Revise the practice of certified registered nurse anesthetists