Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB1564

Introduced
2/1/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Refer
2/3/21  

Caption

Landlord and tenant; delinquent rent; prohibiting discretion to extend terms of tenancy; authorizing late payment fee; providing for enforcement of act; effective date.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1564 would streamline the eviction process for landlords by codifying strict timelines related to tenant non-payment. The bill states that landlords may terminate rental agreements if tenants fail to pay rent within five days of receiving notice. Additionally, the legislation authorizes landlords to enforce late payment fees up to 15% of the monthly rent. These amendments could significantly impact tenants, particularly those who are unable to pay rent on time, by potentially increasing the rate of evictions and reducing tenants' ability to negotiate terms with landlords in cases of delinquency.

Summary

House Bill 1564 aims to amend the existing landlord-tenant laws in Oklahoma, specifically focusing on the handling of delinquent rent. The bill outlines procedures for landlords to take legal action to recover unpaid rent and emphasizes a more expedited process for terminating rental agreements due to non-payment. A key feature of the bill is the provision allowing landlords to seek immediate possession of the property upon a judgment in their favor, without the court having discretion to extend the tenancy. This legislative change reflects a strong emphasis on landlords' rights regarding non-payment of rent.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1564 is notably contentious. Supporters, often from the property owner community, argue that the bill provides necessary protections for landlords and ensures that rental agreements are honored without undue delay. They believe that strict enforcement is essential in maintaining the financial viability of the housing market. Conversely, opponents, including tenant advocacy groups, express concerns that the bill disproportionately favors landlords at the expense of vulnerable tenants. Critics argue that the lack of judicial discretion in extending tenancy terms could lead to unjust evictions and hardship for those struggling financially.

Contention

The main points of contention regarding HB 1564 focus on the balance of power between landlords and tenants in Oklahoma. Critics argue that by removing discretion from the courts, the bill undermines tenants' rights and reduces opportunities for judicial intervention in potentially unjust situations. Furthermore, the allowance for immediate possession enforcement upon judgment raises concerns about the potential for increased homelessness among renters unable to catch up on their payments. This contentious debate highlights a significant divide in perspectives regarding landlord and tenant responsibilities, particularly in the context of economic pressures exacerbated by events like health emergencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2219

Landlord-tenant: 3rd-party payments.

CA AB2493

Tenancy: application screening fee.

CA AB878

Victims of abuse or violence: reasonable accommodations.

CA AB414

Residential tenancies: return of security.

CA AB12

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2801

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2785

Tenancy: applications and security deposits.