Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB3514

Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Refer
2/21/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  
Engrossed
3/23/22  
Refer
3/29/22  

Caption

Professions and occupations; pharmacy benefit plans; definitions; modifying powers of Insurance Department; effective date.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3514 is expected to significantly affect state laws governing pharmacy benefit management by enhancing regulatory control over PBMs. This could lead to better protections for pharmacies and patients by ensuring fair reimbursement practices and preventing below-cost reimbursements. In particular, the bill stipulates that if a PBM denies a reimbursement claim, it must provide a detailed justification, thus creating a more accountable system for drug pricing. Moreover, by requiring periodic updates to MAC lists, the bill seeks to reflect current drug costs accurately, promoting fairness for both consumers and pharmacies.

Summary

House Bill 3514 addresses the regulation of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) in Oklahoma, aiming to modify the authority of the Oklahoma Insurance Department regarding the oversight and licensing of these entities. The bill outlines definitions relevant to pharmacy benefits management, including what constitutes a covered entity and a covered individual. It mandates that PBMs are required to obtain licenses and adhere to specific regulations concerning drug pricing, maximum allowable cost (MAC) lists, and appeals processes for reimbursement disputes. The intent is to provide more oversight and transparency in the prescription drug reimbursement system used by PBMs.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards HB 3514 appears to be positive among supporters who argue that the bill will increase accountability and transparency within the pharmacy benefits management landscape. Proponents believe it will improve pharmacy operations and ensure that pharmacies receive reasonable compensation for the services they provide. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential for increased administrative burdens on PBMs and whether such regulations might impact the availability of services or accessibility to medications for patients.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 3514 include the balance between regulatory oversight and operational freedom for PBMs. Critics of stringent regulations fear that overly stringent controls might hinder innovative pricing strategies that PBMs utilize to manage costs effectively. Some industry representatives have voiced concerns about the potential for rising operational costs that could arise from complying with the new requirements, which they argue could ultimately be passed down to consumers. The bill reflects ongoing debates in the healthcare industry about regulation, cost control, and access to essential medications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK SB789

Pharmacy benefit managers; permitting use of certain records without limitations of date or source for certain purposes; establishing certain reimbursement rates for certain drugs. Effective date.

OK SB549

Pharmacy benefits management; modifying provisions ad requirements of managers; modifying administration by the Insurance Department. Effective date.

OK SB549

Pharmacy benefits management; modifying provisions ad requirements of managers; modifying administration by the Insurance Department. Effective date.

WV HB4112

Provide consumers a choice for pharmacy services

OK SB1670

Pharmacy benefits management; modifying audit processes and requirements; modifying reimbursement rates. Emergency.

OK SB821

Patient's Right to Pharmacy Choice Act; modifying certain contract restrictions; modifying monitoring requirements of certain insurers. Effective date.

WV SB852

Relating to regulation of pharmacy benefit managers

MS SB2738

State employees health plan; set provisions and restrictions related to pharmacy benefit manager.