The bill empowers the Attorney General with regulatory authority over PBMs and enables oversight mechanisms to prevent practices that could harm pharmacies or their patients. By modifying the audit notice requirements and requiring that notices include specific details, the bill aims to give pharmacies adequate time and resources to prepare for audits. Additionally, it mandates that any funds recouped during audits must first be returned to patients, reinforcing the notion that patient interests should be prioritized in financial dealings related to healthcare.
Summary
Senate Bill 1670, also known as the Pharmacy Audit Integrity Act, focuses on the regulation of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) by establishing guidelines to ensure fair auditing processes and reimbursement practices for pharmacies. This bill amends existing Oklahoma statutes related to pharmacy reimbursement and auditing, aiming to create uniform standards that would protect pharmacies from potential misuse of power by PBMs during audits. Under this act, PBMs are required to provide clear communication regarding audit processes and must ensure that audits do not interfere with pharmacy operations.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 1670 seems generally supportive among those who advocate for both pharmacy independence and patient rights. Many believe that this bill signifies an essential step towards holding PBMs accountable and ensuring that pharmacies operate fairly without undue pressure from larger auditing firms. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential financial burdens on PBMs imposed by these strict regulations, as well as how these changes will be practically implemented within the current healthcare framework.
Contention
One notable point of contention encapsulated within SB 1670 is the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational independence of pharmacy benefits managers. Critics argue that while the bill aims to protect pharmacies and patients, it could inadvertently lead to increased costs for PBMs, which may be passed down to consumers in the form of higher drug prices. Furthermore, discussions in committee meetings highlighted anxieties from some legislators about how such regulations could impact the overall access to and affordability of pharmaceuticals within the state.
Practice of pharmacy; allowing pharmacist to test or screen for and initiate drug therapy under certain circumstances; specifying allowed tests; modifying and adding certain definitions. Effective date. Emergency.
Professions and occupations; Oklahoma Pharmacy Act, modifying definition; authorizing pharmacists to screen and test for certain conditions; codification; effective date.
Pharmacy benefit managers; permitting use of certain records without limitations of date or source for certain purposes; establishing certain reimbursement rates for certain drugs. Effective date.