Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB3648

Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Refer
2/14/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Engrossed
3/15/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/12/22  
Enrolled
5/12/22  

Caption

Criminal procedure; creating Mackenzie's Law; preliminary hearings; show cause hearing; effective date.

Impact

The implementation of Mackenzie's Law is expected to significantly revise the current procedures for preliminary hearings in Oklahoma. By setting a hard deadline for conducting these hearings and ensuring the availability of evidence prior to the hearings, the bill aims to streamline judicial efficiency. This could help reduce backlog in courts and improve the timely administration of justice, particularly in felony cases. Furthermore, the legislation aims to clarify the responsibilities of district attorneys regarding available law enforcement reports, which may aid in legal transparency for defendants.

Summary

House Bill 3648, referred to as Mackenzie's Law, aims to amend criminal procedure in Oklahoma by establishing specific guidelines for preliminary hearings. It addresses the timing and scheduling of these hearings, mandating that they occur within nine months of a defendant's initial appearance. Additionally, the bill requires that law enforcement reports be made available for inspection to the defendant at least five working days before the preliminary hearing. These amendments are intended to enhance the rights of defendants and ensure more expedient judicial processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3648 appears to be generally positive, especially among proponents who view it as a necessary update to outdated procedures that could better protect defendants’ rights. Legislative discussions indicated support from various members of the House, as evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor of the bill. However, there are concerns regarding the practical implications of implementing these changes quickly and effectively, especially in terms of resource allocation for the district attorneys and the court system.

Contention

Despite the overall support for the bill, notable points of contention may arise around the interpretation and implementation of the procedures it establishes. There might be challenges regarding the timely provision of law enforcement reports by district attorneys, which could potentially hinder the process if not managed properly. Additionally, while the bill seeks to standardize practices, there is a concern about how these changes will affect smaller counties with fewer resources and their capability to comply with the new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1361

Property taxation: veteran’s exemption: preliminary application.

CA AB2214

California Environmental Quality Act: schoolsites: acquisition of property: school districts, charter schools, and private schools.

CA AB762

Hazardous emissions and substances: schoolsites: private and charter schools.

CA AB757

Teacher credentialing: out-of-state prepared teachers.

ND HB1367

Adoption and referral of preliminary budgets of cities, counties, school districts, and park districts; and to provide an effective date.

ME LD1730

An Act to Implement Changes to the Laws Relating to Judicial Separation and Divorce Regarding Preliminary Injunctions as Recommended by the Family Law Advisory Commission

CA AB1820

Housing development projects: applications: fees and exactions.

LA HB567

Provides relative to certain pretrial procedures