Oklahoma House Bill HJR1029

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 3/2/22

Caption

Constitutional amendment; authorizing an economically disadvantaged levy for certain school districts; ballot title; filing.

Impact

If passed, HJR1029 would amend Section 9 of Article 10 of the Oklahoma Constitution, specifically granting ten school districts—having the highest rates of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch—the ability to impose this additional tax. This would enable these districts to enhance their funding mechanisms permanently until rescinded by voters. The introduction of this levy is intended to alleviate funding shortages and provide necessary resources to bolster education in areas with significant economic challenges.

Summary

HJR1029 is a proposed constitutional amendment in Oklahoma that seeks to allow certain economically disadvantaged school districts the ability to raise an additional five-mill ad valorem tax levy on taxable property within their jurisdiction. This amendment would only apply if approved by a majority of the voters in the respective districts. The funds generated from this levy would be utilized to address the high economic needs of these districts, ensuring that the educational requirements of the student population are met more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR1029 appears to be generally supportive among advocates of educational equity, as it directly targets districts struggling with financial limitations. Supporters argue that this measure will empower local communities to make independent decisions about their funding, addressing unique needs without depending solely on state-level allocations. However, skepticism may exist as to whether this approach sufficiently addresses the core issues of inequitable education funding across the state.

Contention

While the measure aims to provide additional resources for disadvantaged districts, some may contend that it places greater reliance on local taxation, which can exacerbate disparities between wealthier and poorer school districts. Critics might argue that the measure could lead to a patchwork of funding capabilities across the state, further entrenching disparities rather than ameliorating them. Additionally, ensuring adequate turnout for the ballot measure could pose challenges, leaving the future of the funding dependent on voter engagement in the respective districts.