Visual and physical inspection of real property; allowing county assessors to use technology to inspect properties. Effective date.
The enactment of SB1117 would significantly affect the assessment process within local jurisdictions. By allowing the use of technology for property inspection, county assessors are expected to gather comprehensive and relevant data regarding property ownership, location, and use categories. This promotion of modern technology not only aims to streamline the assessment processes but also ensures that the valuation methodologies applied are thorough and efficient in establishing fair cash values for properties. Such improvements could potentially increase transparency and equity in property taxation.
Senate Bill 1117, titled as the Visual and Physical Inspection of Real Property Act, focuses on modernizing the inspection processes for real property by county assessors in Oklahoma. The bill amends Section 2821 of Title 68 of the Oklahoma Statutes to permit county assessors to utilize technological advancements such as oblique imagery, ortho-imagery, and high-resolution imagery as part of their inspection methods. This change aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of property valuations, ensuring they align with accepted standards for mass appraisal practice.
General sentiment surrounding SB1117 appears positive, particularly among proponents who advocate for the adoption of technology in public services. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a forward-thinking approach, placing Oklahoma at the forefront of modern assessment practices. Conversely, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding the implementation of new technologies, particularly in terms of costs, training, and data privacy. Nevertheless, the overall reception indicates a favorable view towards technological enhancements in government processes.
Although there seems to be strong support for SB1117, some points of contention could arise regarding the costs associated with implementing such technologies and the potential need for training of county assessors in using new systems. Critics may voice concerns that the transition to a technologically advanced inspection process could overshadow traditional methods and that not all counties might have equal access to the necessary technology. Stakeholders will likely need to address these considerations to ensure a smooth implementation that benefits all parties involved.