| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | - | ENGR. S. B. NO. 1455 Page 1 1 | |
| 3 | + | SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1455 SFLR Page 1 | |
| 4 | + | (Bold face denotes Committee Amen dments) 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | 6 | |
| 9 | 10 | 7 | |
| 10 | 11 | 8 | |
| 11 | 12 | 9 | |
| 12 | 13 | 10 | |
| 13 | 14 | 11 | |
| 14 | 15 | 12 | |
| 15 | 16 | 13 | |
| 16 | 17 | 14 | |
| 17 | 18 | 15 | |
| 18 | 19 | 16 | |
| 19 | 20 | 17 | |
| 20 | 21 | 18 | |
| 21 | 22 | 19 | |
| 22 | 23 | 20 | |
| 23 | 24 | 21 | |
| 24 | 25 | 22 | |
| 25 | 26 | 23 | |
| 26 | 27 | 24 | |
| 27 | 28 | ||
| 28 | - | ENGROSSED SENATE | |
| 29 | - | BILL NO. 1455 By: Daniels and Rogers of the | |
| 30 | - | Senate | |
| 29 | + | SENATE FLOOR VERSION | |
| 30 | + | February 22, 2022 | |
| 31 | 31 | ||
| 32 | - | and | |
| 33 | 32 | ||
| 34 | - | Moore of the House | |
| 33 | + | SENATE BILL NO. 1455 By: Daniels | |
| 34 | + | ||
| 35 | + | ||
| 35 | 36 | ||
| 36 | 37 | ||
| 37 | 38 | ||
| 38 | 39 | An Act relating to the Administrative Proced ures Act; | |
| 39 | 40 | requiring a court or an adminis trative hearing | |
| 40 | 41 | officer to provide de novo interpretation of statute, | |
| 41 | 42 | rule, or other document; establishing guidelines for | |
| 42 | 43 | court interpretation of statute, rule, or other | |
| 43 | 44 | document in certain actions; providing for | |
| 44 | 45 | codification; and providing an effective d ate. | |
| 46 | + | ||
| 47 | + | ||
| 45 | 48 | ||
| 46 | 49 | ||
| 47 | 50 | ||
| 48 | 51 | BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: | |
| 49 | 52 | SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified | |
| 50 | 53 | in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 318.1 of Title 75, unless there | |
| 51 | 54 | is created a duplication in numb ering, reads as follows: | |
| 52 | 55 | In the interpretation of a state statute, administrative rule, | |
| 53 | 56 | or other subregulatory document, a court of this state or an officer | |
| 54 | 57 | hearing an administrative action shall not defer to the | |
| 55 | 58 | interpretation of a state agency and shall interpret the meaning and | |
| 56 | 59 | effect de novo. In an action brought by or against a state agency, | |
| 57 | 60 | after applying all customary tools of interpretat ion, the court or | |
| 58 | 61 | hearing officer shall exercise any remaining d oubt in favor of a | |
| 59 | 62 | reasonable interpretation which lim its agency power and maximizes | |
| 60 | 63 | individual liberty. | |
| 61 | - | SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2022. | |
| 62 | 64 | ||
| 63 | - | ENGR. S. B. NO. 1455 Page 2 1 | |
| 65 | + | SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1455 SFLR Page 2 | |
| 66 | + | (Bold face denotes Committee Amen dments) 1 | |
| 64 | 67 | 2 | |
| 65 | 68 | 3 | |
| 66 | 69 | 4 | |
| 67 | 70 | 5 | |
| 68 | 71 | 6 | |
| 69 | 72 | 7 | |
| 70 | 73 | 8 | |
| 71 | 74 | 9 | |
| 72 | 75 | 10 | |
| 73 | 76 | 11 | |
| 74 | 77 | 12 | |
| 75 | 78 | 13 | |
| 76 | 79 | 14 | |
| 77 | 80 | 15 | |
| 78 | 81 | 16 | |
| 79 | 82 | 17 | |
| 80 | 83 | 18 | |
| 81 | 84 | 19 | |
| 82 | 85 | 20 | |
| 83 | 86 | 21 | |
| 84 | 87 | 22 | |
| 85 | 88 | 23 | |
| 86 | 89 | 24 | |
| 87 | 90 | ||
| 88 | - | Passed the Senate the 9th day of March, 2022. | |
| 89 | - | ||
| 90 | - | ||
| 91 | - | ||
| 92 | - | Presiding Officer of the Senate | |
| 93 | - | ||
| 94 | - | ||
| 95 | - | Passed the House of Representatives the ____ day of __________, | |
| 96 | - | 2022. | |
| 97 | - | ||
| 98 | - | ||
| 99 | - | ||
| 100 | - | Presiding Officer of the House | |
| 101 | - | of Representatives | |
| 102 | - | ||
| 91 | + | SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2022. | |
| 92 | + | COMMITTEE REPORT BY: COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY | |
| 93 | + | February 22, 2022 - DO PASS |