County clerks; permitting certified copies to be made in accordance with the Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act; allowing fee for certified records. Effective date.
If enacted, SB569 would have a significant impact on how county clerks manage and provide access to public records, particularly in an electronic format. It establishes guidelines regarding fees that may be charged for these certified copies, ensuring they remain reasonable and accessible. The bill also aims to modernize record-keeping practices by promoting electronic recording methods. This change could potentially lead to improved efficiency in handling public records and clarity regarding the costs associated with obtaining them.
Senate Bill 569 aims to amend sections of the Oklahoma statutes concerning county clerks and the duties related to audited accounts. The bill specifically allows for certified copies of records to be made in accordance with the Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act. Additionally, it permits county clerks to charge fees for these certified records as outlined in the state’s Open Records Act and related fee schedule. The intent behind the bill is to streamline the process for obtaining public records and improve access to real property records in electronic formats.
The sentiment surrounding SB569 appears to be largely positive, with legislative discussions indicating support for modernizing the processes surrounding public records. Supporters argue that facilitating access to certified records in electronic formats aligns with contemporary needs for transparency and efficiency in government. However, some concerns may arise regarding the fees that county clerks can impose and ensuring they do not overly restrict access to information.
While there are no significant contentious points highlighted in the discussions, the potential for differing interpretations of what constitutes a 'reasonable fee' may lead to discussions among county clerks and constituents. The stipulation that news media and licensed abstractors are exempt from certain fees reflects an intention to prioritize public information access but may also spark debate over the implications of such exemptions on revenue for county clerks' offices.