Oklahoma Senate Bill SB992

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21

Caption

Oklahoma Open Records Act; requiring confidentiality of certain information. Effective date.

Impact

The implications of SB992 on state laws are significant as it redefines the balance between transparency and personal privacy within government operations. By modifying what is deemed accessible under the Open Records Act, the bill may limit the public's ability to scrutinize government actions, particularly in terms of how public officials and employees are evaluated and disciplined. Supporters of the bill argue that it is essential for protecting personal privacy against unwarranted disclosures, which can lead to misuse of personal information and potential harm to individuals named in such records.

Summary

Senate Bill 992 seeks to amend the Oklahoma Open Records Act by allowing greater confidentiality for certain information related to personnel records and voluntarily provided information. The bill modifies existing definitions and provisions within the Act, which governs the public's access to government documents and records. Particularly, it allows public bodies to maintain confidentiality over an employee’s personal information, evaluations, and other details that were previously accessible. This change aims to protect the privacy of public employees and enhance their rights regarding the confidentiality of their records.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB992 include concerns from watchdogs and civil rights groups about potential overreach into government transparency. Critics argue that the bill could stifle public access to information crucial for holding public officials accountable, leading to a lack of trust and transparency in government operations. Those opposing the bill voice fears that it may create a culture of secrecy, where records that should be public become inaccessible, thereby undermining democratic principles. The tension between ensuring employee privacy and maintaining public oversight over government actions remains a critical aspect of the ongoing debate.