Joint resolution; Convention of States under Article V; proposing amendments to U.S. Constitution. Directing transmission.
Impact
If enacted, SJR23 would initiate a process that allows states to propose amendments directly addressing their grievances with federal management of fiscal policy and other areas of governance. By calling for a convention, Oklahoma is positioning itself alongside other states that have previously expressed a desire for similar amendments, potentially creating a unified front that could influence federal law due to increased state involvement in constitutional amendments.
Summary
SJR23, also referred to as the United States Senator, Dr. Tom Coburn Resolution of 2021, seeks to call for a convention of states under Article V of the United States Constitution. The primary aim is to propose amendments that would require the federal government to maintain a balanced budget, impose fiscal restraints, limit its power and jurisdiction, and set term limits for federal officials, including members of Congress. This resolution stems from concerns about the increasing federal debt and perceived overreach into state matters by the national government.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SJR23 appears mixed but leans towards a sense of urgency for reform among its supporters, who argue that the federal government's fiscal irresponsibility poses a threat to liberty and state rights. Advocates within the Oklahoma Legislature have emphasized that state legislators should safeguard freedoms against potential federal abuses. Conversely, critics worry about the implications of a constitutional convention, fearing it could lead to unintended consequences that may jeopardize existing rights or governmental structures.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding SJR23 include concerns about the risks associated with a convention itself, as it could open the door to broader amendments that may not align with the intentions of the original resolution. Opposition voices argue that while fiscal management is critical, the process of amending the Constitution through a convention could introduce uncertainties and diverging interests that might undermine the protections currently afforded under the Constitution.
Joint Resolution; Article V Convention; amendments to the U.S, Constitution and a gathering of the states in preparation for Article V Convention; termination date; filing.
JOINT RESOLUTION MAKING APPLICATION TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CALLING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION UNDER ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION LIMITED TO PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO REQUIRE A BALANCED FEDERAL BUDGET
JOINT RESOLUTION RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A CONVENTION OF THE STATES UNDER ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (Petitions congress to call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution to impose restraints on the federal government.)
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing an amendment to the constitution to provide for a federal balanced budget.