Oklahoma Constitution; Article V Constitutional Conventions; procedures; filing.
The resolution establishes a framework for how Oklahoma will select its commissioners to attend the proposed convention. This includes appointing seven members, with specific requirements regarding their current or former status as legislators. The delegation will be bound by rules regarding unauthorized amendments, ensuring that commissioners adhere to the legislature's instructions. The passage of HJR1017 expresses Oklahoma's intent to play an active role in shaping federal regulations and governance structures.
HJR1017 is a Joint Resolution from the Oklahoma Legislature that authorizes a delegation to attend and participate in an Article V Convention for proposing amendments to the United States Constitution. The resolution aims to convene states in a bid to impose a balanced federal budget requirement and to put fiscal restraints on the federal government. Additionally, it seeks to limit the powers and jurisdiction of the federal government and set term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. The involvement of Oklahoma in this initiative reflects a growing trend among states to pursue constitutional amendments through a coordinated convention process.
The sentiment surrounding HJR1017 is mixed, with supporters viewing it as a necessary step towards squeezing the federal government and restoring fiscal discipline. These proponents argue that it empowers states to reclaim authority over budgetary matters and curbs federal overreach. However, critics express concern about the potential for unintended consequences, such as an unpredictable expansion of state powers or amendments that could undermine civil rights or liberties, highlighting the contentious nature of proposing changes to the Constitution through conventions.
The key point of contention in discussions around HJR1017 pertains to the scope and authority of the proposed convention. Opponents worry that once convened, the Article V Convention might stray from its stated agenda and discuss issues not originally intended by the participating states. The resolution's strict guidelines for commissioners and the processes for replacing those who violate mandates were hot topics, revealing a deep-seated concern over maintaining control and focus during such a high-stakes event.