Joint resolution; Convention of States under Article V; proposing amendments to U.S. Constitution. Directing transmission.
If enacted, SJR23 would initiate a process that allows states to propose amendments directly addressing their grievances with federal management of fiscal policy and other areas of governance. By calling for a convention, Oklahoma is positioning itself alongside other states that have previously expressed a desire for similar amendments, potentially creating a unified front that could influence federal law due to increased state involvement in constitutional amendments.
SJR23, also referred to as the United States Senator, Dr. Tom Coburn Resolution of 2021, seeks to call for a convention of states under Article V of the United States Constitution. The primary aim is to propose amendments that would require the federal government to maintain a balanced budget, impose fiscal restraints, limit its power and jurisdiction, and set term limits for federal officials, including members of Congress. This resolution stems from concerns about the increasing federal debt and perceived overreach into state matters by the national government.
The sentiment surrounding SJR23 appears mixed but leans towards a sense of urgency for reform among its supporters, who argue that the federal government's fiscal irresponsibility poses a threat to liberty and state rights. Advocates within the Oklahoma Legislature have emphasized that state legislators should safeguard freedoms against potential federal abuses. Conversely, critics worry about the implications of a constitutional convention, fearing it could lead to unintended consequences that may jeopardize existing rights or governmental structures.
Notable points of contention regarding SJR23 include concerns about the risks associated with a convention itself, as it could open the door to broader amendments that may not align with the intentions of the original resolution. Opposition voices argue that while fiscal management is critical, the process of amending the Constitution through a convention could introduce uncertainties and diverging interests that might undermine the protections currently afforded under the Constitution.