Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB3039

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/29/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  
Refer
3/27/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  

Caption

Law library fees; transfers; Law Library Fund; surplus; board of trustees; civil court fees; effective date.

Impact

The modifications made by HB 3039 aim to address the funding and operational challenges faced by law libraries in Oklahoma, particularly in larger counties. By facilitating the transfer of court funds to law libraries, the bill seeks to ensure that these libraries have the necessary resources to support legal research and education. Also, the restructuring of court fees is expected to provide a more balanced system across counties, making it easier for citizens to access legal information and services while promoting the sustainability of legal institutions.

Summary

House Bill 3039 amends various sections of Oklahoma statutes to modify law library funding and court fee structures. The bill authorizes counties with populations over 300,000 to transfer up to $10,000 annually from their court funds to their law library funds. Additionally, it establishes a flat fee schedule for various civil court actions, with specific amounts designated for counties based on their population. The fees collected are intended for the support and operation of law libraries, enhancing legal access for the public and improving judicial resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3039 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among legal professionals and county officials who recognize the importance of law libraries in fostering legal literacy and access to justice. However, there may be some contention regarding the potential impact on court fee burdens for litigants. Some critics may argue that increased fees could disproportionately affect those unable to afford legal representation, highlighting concerns about equitable access to the judicial system.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between funding law libraries and ensuring that the costs associated with court fees do not impede access to justice for low-income individuals. Critics may challenge whether the proposed fees align with the principles of equitable legal access and whether the benefits of improved law library resources outweigh the financial burden on the public and litigants. Moreover, the requirement for a board of trustees vote for fund transfers in certain counties might also lead to debates regarding local governance and financial autonomy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB805

Small nonprofit performing arts organizations: payroll and paymaster services: grants.

CA SB71

Jurisdiction: small claims and limited civil case.

CA AB645

Fish and wildlife: poaching: penalties: probation period.

CA AB1753

Fish and wildlife: poaching: penalties: probation period.

CA SB417

California Victim Compensation Board: claim.

CA AB249

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

CA AB1503

Pharmacy.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.