Agency operations; procedures for federal rule and regulation review. Emergency.
The bill empowers the Legislature to disapprove any federal rule or regulation through a joint resolution, providing a significant check on federal authority. Once disapproved, an agency would be prohibited from complying with the federal rule, effectively nullifying it unless the Legislature explicitly allows it. This oversight mechanism is expected to create a more localized control over regulatory adherence and could result in a divergence from federal standards, particularly if state legislators see certain federal regulations as overreaching or unnecessary.
Senate Bill 1687 introduces a new framework for state agencies in Oklahoma regarding the implementation of federal rules and regulations. The bill mandates that any time a state agency receives a requirement to adopt, follow, or submit to a new or modified federal rule, it must inform the Legislature and the Governor via electronic mail. This procedural step is intended to increase transparency and legislative oversight over federal impositions on state agencies.
Debate surrounding SB1687 may revolve around the balance of power between state and federal authorities, as well as the implications for state agency operations. Critics are likely to express concerns regarding the potential for legislative gridlock, where federal regulations that may be beneficial or necessary could be halted due to disapproval by a legislative majority. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for the exemption of state agencies and employees from liability when complying with its directives, which could raise questions about accountability and the protection of public interests.