Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1705

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  
Refer
3/25/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Enrolled
5/30/24  

Caption

Alien ownership of land; defining terms; adding entities prohibited from certain ownership; modifying requirements for execution of certain affidavit. Effective date.

Impact

The passage of SB1705 will significantly impact the regulatory framework governing land ownership in Oklahoma, particularly concerning who can hold title to land. By restricting land ownership to U.S. citizens and certain exempted entities, the bill aims to protect local interests and national security. The new regulations will affect businesses and foreign investors looking to acquire land for expansions or developments in the state, potentially reshaping the real estate landscape and the dynamics of foreign investment in Oklahoma.

Summary

Senate Bill 1705 aims to amend statutes regarding alien ownership of land in the state of Oklahoma. The bill specifically seeks to prohibit ownership of land by aliens and foreign government adversaries, while providing exemptions for resident aliens and certain foreign government entities under specified circumstances. Furthermore, it introduces new definitions and requirements related to the transfer of land ownership to ensure compliance with state law. The law requires that any deeds recorded with county clerks include a notarized affidavit attesting to compliance with these regulations, adding a layer of accountability to land transactions involving foreign interests.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1705 appears to be largely supportive among legislators prioritizing state autonomy and local governance. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to mitigate risks associated with foreign ownership of land, especially in terms of national security. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders that the bill may discourage legitimate foreign investment and complicate real estate transactions. Critics fear that overly strict regulations could lead to negative economic repercussions, while supporters contend that it is a measure to safeguard local control and resources.

Contention

Debate around SB1705 revealed notable points of contention, particularly regarding the distinction between harmful foreign adversaries and legitimate foreign entities seeking to invest in Oklahoma. Some lawmakers voiced concerns about the potential negative impact on economic growth and the property market due to restrictions on foreign ownership. Additionally, the requirement for notarized affidavits may lead to administrative burdens for entities wishing to acquire land, highlighting ongoing discussions about the balance between regulatory oversight and economic opportunity. The effective date of the bill, set for November 1, 2024, suggests that there will be a transition period during which stakeholders can adapt to these new regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB2992

Relating to asset forfeiture under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

TX HB916

Relating to the tracking, reporting, and disposition of proceeds and property from asset forfeiture proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

TX SB665

Relating to the tracking, reporting, and disposition of proceeds and property from asset forfeiture proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

TX SB839

Relating to asset forfeiture under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

HI HB1965

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

TX SB316

Relating to criminal asset forfeiture, the disposition of proceeds and property from criminal asset forfeiture, and accountability for that disposition; providing civil penalties.

IN HB1281

Civil forfeiture.

IN SB0263

Evidence preservation requirements.