Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB133

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
3/6/25  
Engrossed
3/27/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  

Caption

Groundwater permits; requiring certain license be presented for intended use of groundwater for medical marijuana grow facilities. Effective date. Emergency.

Impact

If enacted, SB133 will directly affect the permitting process overseen by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Applications for groundwater use related to medical marijuana will be subject to increased scrutiny, ensuring that applicants are compliant with the state's marijuana cultivation regulations. This could potentially streamline the permitting process by linking it directly to valid licenses, thereby reducing the risk of unauthorized water use for marijuana cultivation purposes.

Summary

Senate Bill 133 seeks to amend Oklahoma state law regarding groundwater use specifically for medical marijuana grow facilities. The bill mandates that any individual or entity intending to utilize groundwater for such facilities must first acquire a valid commercial grower license issued by the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority. This requirement is intended to ensure that only licensed entities can use groundwater resources in the context of marijuana cultivation, thus promoting responsible water resource management in relation to this industry.

Sentiment

General sentiment toward SB133 appears to be supportive, stemming from a desire to align groundwater use with existing regulations for medical marijuana. By establishing clear requirements for permits, the bill seeks to address concerns over water usage and conservation in the context of agricultural practices within the marijuana industry. Stakeholders in the medical marijuana sector are likely to welcome this clarity, as it may facilitate a more predictable regulatory environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the implications this bill has for unregulated groundwater use and the potential for increased bureaucratic processes. While proponents argue that requiring a commercial grower license will enhance regulatory compliance, some may contend that it could disproportionately burden smaller growers or new entrants into the market who may find it challenging to navigate these requirements. The debate will likely center on finding a balance between regulation and the facilitation of business growth within the state's medical marijuana sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.