Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB641

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
3/6/25  
Engrossed
3/31/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  

Caption

Motor vehicle repair; creating the Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Consumer Protection Act; establishing certain hourly market rate for labor. Effective date.

Impact

If enacted, SB641 will have significant implications for the auto body repair industry and insurance companies in Oklahoma. By regulating the maximum amount that can be charged for storage and administrative fees, the act intends to protect consumers from excessive charges during the vehicle repair process. Furthermore, the legislation requires auto body repair shops to provide written invoices and respond promptly to inquiries, enhancing consumer rights in transactions with repair shops and insurance companies.

Summary

Senate Bill 641, known as the Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Consumer Protection Act, aims to establish standards for auto body repair and set hourly market rates for labor related to total loss vehicles. The bill mandates that the Insurance Department determine and adjust the hourly market rate for labor based on prevailing market prices and inflation. Additionally, it protects consumers by capping administrative charges and storage fees, thereby ensuring that auto body repair practices are transparent and fair.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB641 appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups, who view it as a necessary measure to increase transparency within the auto body repair sector. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to more equitable treatment of consumers, enabling them to avoid unexpected costs. However, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of these regulations on auto body shops, which may feel burdened by the additional regulatory requirements and limitations on their pricing structures.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention related to SB641 include the discussion around the feasibility of the cost caps imposed on storage and administrative charges. While consumer advocates argue for their necessity to prevent exploitation, some auto body repair shops argue that these caps may not adequately cover their operational costs, particularly in cases where prolonged storage becomes necessary due to delays in insurance approvals. The balance between consumer protection and the viability of auto repair businesses is a central theme in the discourse around this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.